ETL vs ELT: A comprehensive exploration of both methodologies, including real-world applications and trade-offs
Keywords:
ETL, Data Transformation, Big DataAbstract
Abstract:
In the world of data integration, Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) and Extract, Load, Transform (ELT) are two foundational methodologies, each with unique strengths and ideal applications. The traditional ETL involves extracting data from various sources, transforming it into a suitable format, and then loading it into a target data warehouse. This methodology has been used for decades, especially when structured data needs thorough cleaning, enrichment, and validation before storage. Conversely, ELT reverses the sequence by loading raw data directly into a data warehouse and transforming it afterward. This approach leverages the power of modern cloud-based data warehouses and their scalable computing resources, making it particularly useful for handling large volumes of raw data. This comprehensive exploration delves into the strengths and limitations of each methodology, providing insights into when each is most suitable. Real-world applications, including use cases in finance, healthcare, and retail industries, reveal how companies leverage ETL for precise data curation and ELT for agile analytics. Additionally, this comparison underscores the trade-offs between ETL’s rigor in maintaining data integrity versus ELT’s flexibility and speed in data processing. By understanding these trade-offs, organizations can make more informed decisions on selecting the best approach for their data needs, optimizing efficiency and performance in their data ecosystems.
Downloads
References
Waas, F., Wrembel, R., Freudenreich, T., Thiele, M., Koncilia, C., & Furtado, P. (2013). On-demand ELT architecture for right-time BI: extending the vision. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining (IJDWM), 9(2), 21-38.
Kakish, K., & Kraft, T. A. (2012). ETL evolution for real-time data warehousing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Information Systems Applied Research ISSN (Vol. 2167, p. 1508).
Azaiez, N., & Akaichi, J. (2017, February). Override Traditional Decision Support Systems-How Trajectory ELT Processes Modeling Improves Decision Making?. In International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (Vol. 2, pp. 550-555). SCITEPRESS.
Davenport, R. J. (2008). ETL vs ELT a subjective view. Insource Commercial aspects of BI whitepaper.
Powell, B. (2018). Mastering Microsoft Power BI: expert techniques for effective data analytics and business intelligence. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Thakurdesai, H. (2016). Establishing an Efficient and Cost-Effective Infrastructure for Small and Medium Enterprises to Drive Data Science Projects from Prototype to Production. Global journal of Business and Integral Security.
Vassiliadis, P., & Simitsis, A. (2008). Near real time ETL. In New trends in data warehousing and data analysis (pp. 1-31). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Diouf, P. S., Boly, A., & Ndiaye, S. (2018, May). Variety of data in the ETL processes in the cloud: State of the art. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Innovative Research and Development (ICIRD) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Morgan, A., Amend, A., George, D., & Hallett, M. (2017). Mastering spark for data science. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Guo, S. S., Yuan, Z. M., Sun, A. B., & Yue, Q. (2015). A new ETL approach based on data virtualization. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 30, 311-323.
Pal, S. (2016). SQL on Big Data: Technology, Architecture, and Innovation. Apress.
Venner, J., Wadkar, S., & Siddalingaiah, M. (2014). Pro apache hadoop. Apress.
Zacek, J., & Hunka, F. (2014). Data warehouse minimization with ELT fuzzy filter. Advances in Information Science and Applications, 2, 450-454.
Freudenreich, T., Furtado, P., Koncilia, C., Thiele, M., Waas, F., & Wrembel, R. (2013). An on-demand ELT architecture for real-time BI. In Enabling Real-Time Business Intelligence: 6th International Workshop, BIRTE 2012, Held at the 38th International Conference on Very Large Databases, VLDB 2012, Istanbul, Turkey, August 27, 2012, Revised Selected Papers 6 (pp. 50-59). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Mukherjee, R., & Kar, P. (2017, January). A comparative review of data warehousing ETL tools with new trends and industry insight. In 2017 IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference (IACC) (pp. 943-948). IEEE.
Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL vs. ELT: Comparative analysis and best practices. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL/ELT, Data Integration Challenges, Integration Patterns. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. Scientific Research Canada disclaims any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding these license terms, please contact us at editor@dlabi.org.
