The Role of Financial Stress Testing During the COVID-19 Crisis: How Banks Ensured Compliance with Basel III
Keywords:
Capital adequacy, liquidity riskAbstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, global financial institutions faced economic strain that tested the resilience of traditional risk management frameworks, particularly stress testing models that are fundamental to Basel III compliance. As a cornerstone of modern banking regulation, stress testing aims to evaluate a bank's ability to endure extreme financial disturbances by projecting the impact of hypothetical, adverse scenarios on its capital adequacy and liquidity. The pandemic's volatile market conditions, marked by unexpected shifts in consumer behavior, credit risk, and global supply chains, highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of existing stress testing frameworks. Banks worldwide were forced to rapidly reassess their risk exposure and adjust their models to account for the sudden economic downturn. However, the unique and unanticipated nature of the COVID-19 crisis revealed several limitations in these stress tests, which traditionally rely on historical data and predefined stress scenarios. Many models needed help to account for the speed and breadth of the pandemic's impact, exposing gaps in forecasting & scenario design. Additionally, regulators had to consider temporary adjustments to capital requirements to prevent a liquidity crunch, underscoring the importance of flexibility in regulatory frameworks. Despite these challenges, stress testing was crucial in helping financial institutions prepare for potential capital shortfalls, enabling proactive interventions to shore up liquidity and ensure stability. This article delves into the adaptations made to stress testing practices during the pandemic, evaluating how banks leveraged these frameworks to comply with Basel III while managing unexpected market volatility. Analyzing these adaptations, limitations, & regulatory responses offers insights into how stress testing models might be strengthened for future crises, advocating for dynamic, forward-looking frameworks that can better capture real-time economic risks and prepare financial systems for unprecedented global disruptions.
Downloads
References
Samitas, A., & Polyzos, S. (2015). To Basel or not to Basel? Banking crises and contagion. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 23(3), 298-318.
Restoy, F. (2019). Central banks and financial stability: A reflection after the Covid-19 outbreak1. In Proceedings of OeNB Workshops (p. 51).
Kapoor, S., & Kaur, M. (2017). Basel III norms: a SWOT and TOWS approach. Vision, 21(3), 250-258.
Board, F. S. (2010). the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Macroeconomic Assessment Group.
Morais, L. S. (2016). 8 THE EU fiscal response to the COVID-19 crisis and the Banking sector: risks and opportunities. Pandemic Crisis and Financial Stability, 265.
Pakravan, K. (2014). Bank capital: the case against Basel. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 22(3), 208-218.
Bank, M. (2011). Pillar 3 disclosures.
Joosen, B. (2016). 11. Releasability Combined Buffer Requirements after the COVID-19 pandemic. Financial Stability amidst the Pandemic Crisis: On Top of the Wave, 359.
Varotto, S. (2011). Liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk and bank capital. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 7(2), 134-152.
Uylangco, K., & Li, S. (2016). An evaluation of the effectiveness of Value-at-Risk (VaR) models for Australian banks under Basel III. Australian Journal of Management, 41(4), 699-718.
Chockalingam, A., Dabadghao, S., & Soetekouw, R. (2018). Strategic risk, banks, and Basel III: estimating economic capital requirements. The Journal of Risk Finance, 19(3), 225-246.
Panama reached high-income, L. A. (1985). STRONG FUNDAMENTALS PRE-PANDEMIC. World Economic Outlook, 1995(2005), 2015.
Alibrandi, A. S., & Frigeni, C. (2016). 12. Restriction for bank capital remuneration in the pandemic: future or an outright extraordinary measure?. Financial Stability amidst the Pandemic Crisis: On Top of the Wave, 393.
Clarke, B. (2016). 4 Cultural reforms in Irish banks. Walking the walk during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pandemic Crisis and Financial Stability, 127.
Gortsos, C. V. (2016). 11 The application of the EU banking resolution framework amidst the pandemic crisis. Pandemic Crisis and Financial Stability, 361.
Komandla, V. Enhancing Security and Fraud Prevention in Fintech: Comprehensive Strategies for Secure Online Account Opening.
Komandla, V. Transforming Financial Interactions: Best Practices for Mobile Banking App Design and Functionality to Boost User Engagement and Satisfaction.
Gade, K. R. (2019). Data Migration Strategies for Large-Scale Projects in the Cloud for Fintech. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 5(1).
Gade, K. R. (2018). Real-Time Analytics: Challenges and Opportunities. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 4(1).
Boda, V. V. R., & Immaneni, J. (2019). Streamlining FinTech Operations: The Power of SysOps and Smart Automation. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 5(1).
Nookala, G., Gade, K. R., Dulam, N., & Thumburu, S. K. R. (2019). End-to-End Encryption in Enterprise Data Systems: Trends and Implementation Challenges. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 5(1).
Muneer Ahmed Salamkar, and Karthik Allam. Architecting Data Pipelines: Best Practices for Designing Resilient, Scalable, and Efficient Data Pipelines. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Jan. 2019
Muneer Ahmed Salamkar. ETL Vs ELT: A Comprehensive Exploration of Both Methodologies, Including Real-World Applications and Trade-Offs. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Mar. 2019
Muneer Ahmed Salamkar. Next-Generation Data Warehousing: Innovations in Cloud-Native Data Warehouses and the Rise of Serverless Architectures. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Apr. 2019
Muneer Ahmed Salamkar. Real-Time Data Processing: A Deep Dive into Frameworks Like Apache Kafka and Apache Pulsar. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, July 2019
Naresh Dulam. Apache Spark: The Future Beyond MapReduce. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Dec. 2015, pp. 136-5
Naresh Dulam. NoSQL Vs SQL: Which Database Type Is Right for Big Data?. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, May 2015, pp. 115-3
Naresh Dulam. Data Lakes: Building Flexible Architectures for Big Data Storage. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Oct. 2015, pp. 95-114
Naresh Dulam. The Rise of Kubernetes: Managing Containers in Distributed Systems. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, July 2015, pp. 73-94
Sarbaree Mishra. A Distributed Training Approach to Scale Deep Learning to Massive Datasets. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Jan. 2019
Sarbaree Mishra, et al. Training Models for the Enterprise - A Privacy Preserving Approach. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Mar. 2019
Sarbaree Mishra. Distributed Data Warehouses - An Alternative Approach to Highly Performant Data Warehouses. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, May 2019
Sarbaree Mishra, et al. Improving the ETL Process through Declarative Transformation Languages. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, June 2019
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. Scientific Research Canada disclaims any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding these license terms, please contact us at editor@dlabi.org.
