The Evolution of Revenue Recognition Under ASC 606: Lessons Learned and Industry-Specific Challenges
Keywords:
ASC 606, accounting standardsAbstract
The implementation of ASC 606, the revenue recognition standard introduced by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), has marked a significant shift in how companies across industries recognize and report revenue. ASC 606 replaces industry-specific guidelines with a comprehensive, principles-based approach, intending to increase transparency and comparability in financial reporting. Since its introduction, companies have encountered a variety of challenges, particularly in sectors with complex customer contracts, such as technology, telecommunications, and life sciences. These challenges include identifying performance obligations, determining transaction prices, and allocating revenue across multiple deliverables. Lessons learned from early adopters highlight the importance of collaboration between finance, operations, and IT teams to ensure accurate and consistent implementation. Many companies have had to adjust their internal processes and data management strategies to align with ASC 606’s five-step model, which includes identifying contracts with customers and recognizing revenue when obligations are met. Industry-specific considerations have also emerged, such as the impact of bundled services in telecom, subscription models in software, and milestone-based payments in pharmaceuticals. For companies navigating this transition, adopting robust data systems, enhancing cross-departmental communication, and investing in continuous training are key strategies to adapt to the requirements and maintain compliance. The evolution under ASC 606 continues to shape the revenue recognition landscape, prompting companies to revisit and refine their approaches as they strive for greater accuracy and transparency in financial disclosures. By examining the obstacles encountered and strategies adopted, companies can better understand the demands of the standard and prepare for future regulatory shifts in financial reporting.
Downloads
References
Chandra, U., Dutta, S. K., & Marcinko, D. J. (2018). Revenue recognition at TSA, Inc.—A roller coaster ride. Issues in Accounting Education, 33(3), 101-116.
GAAP, U. (2018). Revenue recognition.
Vandenberghe, D., Kitchen, P., Adkisson, J., & Pinkstaff, K. (2017). Changes to revenue recognition in the healthcare industry. Retrieved on April, 2, 2018.
James, M. L. (2016). REVENUE RECOGNITION AT INGELHEIM SUSTAINABILITY CONSULTANTS-A CASE EXPLORING THE EFFECT OF THE NEW CONVERGED STANDARD. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 22(2), 76.
Flood, J. M. (2017). Wiley Revenue Recognition,+ Website: Understanding and Implementing the New Standard. John Wiley & Sons.
Du, N., Alford, R. M., & Smith, P. L. (2016). Do GAAP And IFRS Differ In Collectiblity Judgments Related To Revenue Recognition?. Journal of Applied Business Research, 32(6), 1675.
HANDBOOK, C. (2008). Governance, risk, and compliance handbook.
Hall, J. A. (2011). Accounting information systems. South-Western Cengage Learning.
Singh, S. (2015). Assessing the Concerns of the Telecommunications Industry Regarding Revenue Recognition. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2002). The analysis and use of financial statements. John Wiley & Sons.
Chiwamit, P., Modell, S., & Yang, C. L. (2014). The societal relevance of management accounting innovations: economic value added and institutional work in the fields of Chinese and Thai state-owned enterprises. Accounting and Business Research, 44(2), 144-180.
Koenigsfeld, J. P. (2007). Developing an industry specific managerial competency model for private club managers in the United States based on important and frequently used management competencies. Auburn University.
Guides, I. (2014). Gaming, September 1, 2014: Audit and Accounting Guide.
Arms, D., & Bercik, T. (2015). Preparing for ASC 606: how to use change management to your advantage. Strategic Finance, 97(5), 34-41.
Nelson, N. (2015). FASB Proposed ASU, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Narrow Scope Improvements and P.
Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL/ELT, Data Integration Challenges, Integration Patterns. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
Gade, K. R. (2017). Migrations: Challenges and Best Practices for Migrating Legacy Systems to Cloud-Based Platforms. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
Komandla, V. Transforming Financial Interactions: Best Practices for Mobile Banking App Design and Functionality to Boost User Engagement and Satisfaction.
Naresh Dulam. The Shift to Cloud-Native Data Analytics: AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Discussing the Growing Trend of Cloud-Native Big Data Processing Solutions. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Feb. 2015, pp. 28-48
Naresh Dulam. DataOps: Streamlining Data Management for Big Data and Analytics . Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 2, Oct. 2016, pp. 28-50
Naresh Dulam. Machine Learning on Kubernetes: Scaling AI Workloads . Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 2, Sept. 2016, pp. 50-70
Naresh Dulam. Data Lakes Vs Data Warehouses: What’s Right for Your Business?. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 2, Nov. 2016, pp. 71-94
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. Scientific Research Canada disclaims any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding these license terms, please contact us at editor@dlabi.org.
