Snowflake vs Redshift: Which Cloud Data Warehouse is Right for You?
Keywords:
ETL processes, data modeling, pay-as-you-go pricingAbstract
Cloud data warehouses have fundamentally changed how businesses manage and analyze large volumes of data, offering enhanced speed, scalability, and flexibility. Two of the most prominent platforms in this space, Snowflake and Amazon Redshift, stand out for their ability to support complex analytical workloads. Still, they differ significantly in their architecture and capabilities. Snowflake, known for its unique multi-cluster, shared-data architecture, offers high scalability & performance by decoupling storage and computing, enabling users to scale resources independently and optimize cost efficiency. Its ability to automatically scale & handle concurrent workloads without affecting performance makes it a popular choice for modern, data-intensive businesses. On the other hand, Amazon Redshift, a part of the AWS ecosystem, provides a more traditional, columnar data warehouse architecture designed to deliver fast query performance for large-scale datasets. With deep integration into the AWS cloud, Redshift is often the go-to choice for organizations already using AWS services, as it benefits from native integrations with tools like Amazon S3, AWS Lambda, & more. While Redshift offers robust performance and strong data compression capabilities, its scalability is more limited than Snowflake's ability to separate computing & storage. Cost structures also vary, with Snowflake charging based on actual usage, offering more predictable pricing. At the same time, Redshift follows an on-demand or reserved pricing model that can be advantageous for longer-term workloads. Additionally, Snowflake's ease of use, particularly its user-friendly interface and SQL compatibility, contrasts with Redshift's slightly steeper learning curve. Both platforms excel in different areas, and choosing the right one depends on various factors, including organizational goals, existing cloud infrastructure, and specific data processing needs. By weighing performance, cost, scalability, and ecosystem fit, businesses can determine which platform is best suited to support their data warehouse requirements.
Downloads
References
Dageville, B., Cruanes, T., Zukowski, M., Antonov, V., Avanes, A., Bock, J., ... & Unterbrunner, P. (2016, June). The snowflake elastic data warehouse. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 215-226).
Fernandes, S., & Bernardino, J. (2016). Cloud Data Warehousing for SMEs. In ICSOFT-EA (pp. 276-282).
Ferreira, P. J., de Almeida, A., & Bernardino, J. (2017). Data Warehousing in the Cloud: Amazon Redshift vs Microsoft Azure SQL. In KDIR (pp. 318-325).
Devarasetty, N. (2017). Scalable Data Engineering Platforms for AI-Powered Business Intelligence. International Journal of Machine Learning Research in Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence, 8(1), 1-27.
Warehouse, C. P. (2001). The Buyers Guide.
Yuhanna, N., Leganza, G., & Lee, J. (2017). The Forrester Wave™: Big Data Warehouse, Q2 2017. Adoption Grows As Enterprises Look To Revive Their EDW Strategy, 17.
Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL/ELT, Data Integration Challenges, Integration Patterns. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
Kurunji, S. J. (2014). Query optimization for cloud data warehouse (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Lowell).
Nadipalli, R. (2017). Effective business intelligence with QuickSight. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Kathiravelu, P., & Sharma, A. (2017). A dynamic data warehousing platform for creating and accessing biomedical data lakes. In Data Management and Analytics for Medicine and Healthcare: Second International Workshop, DMAH 2016, Held at VLDB 2016, New Delhi, India, September 9, 2016, Revised Selected Papers 2 (pp. 101-120). Springer International Publishing.
Brito, J. J. (2017). Data Warehouses na era do Big Data: processamento eficiente de Junções Estrela no Hadoop (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo).
Aho, M. (2017). Optimisation of Ad-hoc analysis of an OLAP cube using SparkSQL.
Sridhar, K. T. (2017). Modern column stores for big data processing. In Big Data Analytics: 5th International Conference, BDA 2017, Hyderabad, India, December 12-15, 2017, Proceedings 5 (pp. 113-125). Springer International Publishing.
Wang, J., Baker, T., Balazinska, M., Halperin, D., Haynes, B., Howe, B., ... & Xu, S. (2017, January). The Myria Big Data Management and Analytics System and Cloud Services. In CIDR (Vol. 47, p. 48).
Coates, M. (2017). Designing a Modern Data Warehouse+ Data Lake.
Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL/ELT, Data Integration Challenges, Integration Patterns. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
Gade, K. R. (2017). Migrations: Challenges and Best Practices for Migrating Legacy Systems to Cloud-Based Platforms. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. Scientific Research Canada disclaims any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding these license terms, please contact us at editor@dlabi.org.
