Federated Learning: Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Machine Learning

Authors

  • Shashi Thota Senior Data Engineer, Naten LLC, San Franciso, USA Author
  • Vinay Kumar Reddy Vangoor System Administrator, Techno Bytes Inc, Arizona, USA Author
  • Amit Kumar Reddy Programmer Analyst, EZ2 Technologies Inc, Alabama, USA Author
  • Chetan Sasidhar Ravi SOA Developer, Fusion Plus Solutions LLC, New Jersey, USA Author

Keywords:

federated learning, privacy-preserving, collaborative machine learning, decentralized data, data heterogeneity

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) represents a significant advancement in the field of collaborative machine learning, offering a paradigm shift toward privacy-preserving model training across decentralized data sources. Unlike traditional machine learning approaches that necessitate the centralization of data, federated learning enables the training of models directly on data located at various nodes, thus circumventing the need for raw data sharing. This abstract provides a comprehensive overview of federated learning, detailing its foundational principles, architectural framework, and practical applications, while also addressing the inherent challenges and future research directions associated with this innovative approach.

At its core, federated learning is a distributed learning technique wherein multiple participants collaboratively train a global model without exchanging their private datasets. The process begins with a global model being initialized and distributed to all participating nodes. Each node then performs local training on its own dataset, subsequently transmitting only the model updates—such as gradients or model parameters—back to a central server. The server aggregates these updates to refine the global model, which is then redistributed to the nodes for further training iterations. This iterative process continues until the model converges to an acceptable performance level.

The architectural design of federated learning can be categorized into several key components: client nodes, a central aggregation server, and the federated learning algorithm. Client nodes are responsible for conducting local training on their datasets, while the central aggregation server oversees the collection and aggregation of model updates. Various federated learning algorithms, including federated averaging (FedAvg), federated stochastic gradient descent (FedSGD), and more, serve as the computational backbone of this architecture. These algorithms ensure that model updates are effectively aggregated and utilized to enhance the global model.

One of the primary advantages of federated learning is its ability to preserve data privacy. By keeping data localized and only sharing model updates, federated learning mitigates the risks associated with data breaches and unauthorized access. This is particularly advantageous in sectors where data sensitivity is paramount, such as healthcare and finance. In healthcare, federated learning facilitates the development of robust predictive models by aggregating insights from disparate medical institutions without compromising patient confidentiality. Similarly, in the financial sector, federated learning enables the construction of fraud detection systems that leverage data from multiple institutions while ensuring compliance with stringent data protection regulations.

Despite its promising benefits, federated learning faces several challenges that must be addressed to realize its full potential. Data heterogeneity is a significant issue, as the data distributions across different nodes may vary widely, leading to difficulties in aggregating updates and achieving convergence. Communication overhead is another challenge, as the process of transmitting model updates between nodes and the central server can be resource-intensive and time-consuming. Additionally, ensuring the security of model updates and protecting against potential adversarial attacks are critical concerns that require robust defense mechanisms.

To address these challenges, ongoing research in federated learning is focused on developing novel techniques and strategies. Approaches such as adaptive federated optimization, differential privacy, and secure multi-party computation are being explored to enhance the efficiency and security of federated learning systems. Adaptive federated optimization aims to improve convergence rates and reduce communication overhead by employing advanced optimization algorithms tailored to federated settings. Differential privacy techniques are employed to add noise to model updates, thereby safeguarding against potential privacy breaches. Secure multi-party computation methods are being investigated to ensure that model updates are protected from malicious actors.

Future research in federated learning is expected to focus on several key areas. Enhancing the scalability of federated learning systems to accommodate a growing number of participants is a critical area of interest. Improving the robustness of federated learning algorithms against data poisoning and other adversarial attacks is also a priority. Furthermore, exploring the integration of federated learning with other emerging technologies, such as blockchain and edge computing, may provide additional benefits and use cases.

Federated learning represents a transformative approach to collaborative machine learning that prioritizes data privacy while enabling the development of powerful predictive models across decentralized data sources. Its unique architecture and advantages make it an attractive option for various applications, though it also presents challenges that require ongoing research and innovation. As the field continues to evolve, federated learning is poised to play a pivotal role in shaping the future of privacy-preserving machine learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Konecny, H. B. McMahan, F. Y. M. Yu, and J. A. Smith, “Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency,” Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), vol. 54, pp. 330-339, 2017.

R. J. Shokri and V. Shmatikov, “Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning,” Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), pp. 1310-1321, 2015.

A. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. Y. Zhang, “Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data,” Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), vol. 54, pp. 1273-1282, 2017.

M. Chen, Y. Zhou, M. Yang, and J. Xu, “Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 109830-109844, 2020.

J. Li, J. Liu, and Y. Zhang, “Federated Learning: A Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning Framework,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1267-1280, 2020.

L. Zhang, M. Chen, and X. Wang, “Advances and Applications of Federated Learning in Healthcare,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 3125-3137, 2020.

A. Ammar, B. Sharma, and A. Y. A. Zhang, “Federated Learning for IoT: A Comprehensive Survey,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 930-945, 2021.

J. Huang, X. Xu, and W. Zhang, “A Survey on Federated Learning: Techniques, Applications, and Challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 3742-3756, 2021.

L. K. Saul, “Modeling and Learning in Federated Systems,” Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 1026-1034, 2020.

S. Zhao, R. Zhang, and L. Lin, “Secure Federated Learning with Blockchain for IoT,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 150-160, 2021.

A. Pandey, N. K. Gupta, and R. Singh, “Federated Learning in Finance: Opportunities and Challenges,” Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 1284-1293, 2019.

H. Yang, X. Liu, and L. Li, “Adaptive Federated Learning for Resource-Constrained IoT Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 64-74, 2021.

Y. Wang, D. Xu, and Z. Xu, “Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning with Differential Privacy,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 15, pp. 3372-3385, 2020.

B. Yang, M. Liu, and R. Liu, “Scalable Federated Learning: A Survey of Techniques and Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 4821-4834, 2021.

A. M. H. Khan and S. M. A. Raza, “Efficient Federated Learning for Edge Computing,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1887-1897, 2021.

G. M. Fiumara and A. E. Anderson, “Federated Learning in Smart Cities: Challenges and Solutions,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 5422-5432, 2021.

C. Zhang, W. Shen, and J. Liu, “Robust Federated Learning: Methods and Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 952-965, 2020.

D. Chen, Y. Li, and L. Xu, “Blockchain-Based Federated Learning: Security and Privacy Perspectives,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1420-1432, 2021.

Z. Zhang, H. Wu, and C. Xu, “Exploring Federated Learning for Cybersecurity: A Survey,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 15, pp. 4553-4564, 2020.

M. H. Chen, Z. Hu, and Y. Zhang, “Federated Learning with Communication-Efficient Strategies,” Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), pp. 3142-3151, 2020.

Downloads

Published

17-08-2019

How to Cite

[1]
S. Thota, V. Kumar Reddy Vangoor, A. Kumar Reddy, and C. Sasidhar Ravi, “Federated Learning: Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Machine Learning”, Distrib Learn Broad Appl Sci Res, vol. 5, pp. 168–190, Aug. 2019, Accessed: Dec. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dlabi.org/index.php/journal/article/view/99

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

61-70 of 198

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.