Serverless Computing for DevOps: Practical Use Cases and Performance Analysis

Authors

  • Venkat Rama Raju Alluri Senior Software Engineer, Oracle India Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad, India Author
  • Venkata Sri Manoj Bonam Data Engineer, Lincoln Financial Group, Omaha, USA Author
  • Vinay Kumar Reddy Vangoor System Administrator, Techno Bytes Inc, Arizona, USA Author
  • Chetan Sasidhar Ravi SOA Developer, Fusion Plus Solutions LLC, New jersey, USA Author

Keywords:

serverless computing, DevOps, AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions, continuous deployment

Abstract

Serverless computing represents a transformative paradigm shift in the deployment and management of cloud-based applications, particularly within the domain of DevOps. This paper explores the intersection of serverless computing and DevOps, offering a comprehensive analysis of practical use cases and performance implications. Serverless architectures, exemplified by services such as AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions, have gained prominence for their ability to abstract infrastructure management, thereby allowing developers to focus more on code and less on operational concerns.

The fundamental tenets of serverless computing—such as event-driven execution, automatic scaling, and pay-as-you-go billing models—are examined in the context of DevOps workflows. By integrating serverless technologies into continuous deployment pipelines, automated testing frameworks, and event-driven architectures, organizations can achieve significant operational efficiencies and agility. This paper provides a detailed overview of how serverless computing can streamline the deployment process, enhance the scalability of applications, and reduce time-to-market, all while maintaining rigorous performance standards.

Case studies presented in this research illustrate practical implementations of serverless computing within various DevOps practices. For instance, the utilization of AWS Lambda for automating deployment processes demonstrates how serverless functions can handle complex deployment tasks without the need for traditional server management. Similarly, Azure Functions are analyzed for their role in facilitating automated testing and continuous integration, underscoring their capacity to integrate seamlessly with existing DevOps tools and processes. Google Cloud Functions are explored for their effectiveness in creating responsive event-driven architectures, which are crucial for real-time data processing and analytics.

Performance analysis is a critical component of this study, focusing on the comparative benefits and trade-offs associated with serverless computing. Key performance metrics such as execution latency, cold start times, and scalability are scrutinized to assess the impact of serverless architectures on overall system performance. Additionally, the cost implications of serverless computing are explored, including a detailed examination of cost structures, potential cost savings, and scenarios where serverless models might incur higher expenses compared to traditional infrastructure.

The paper also delves into future trends and research directions in serverless computing for DevOps. As the serverless ecosystem continues to evolve, emerging technologies and advancements are likely to further influence DevOps practices. The study identifies key areas for future exploration, including the integration of serverless computing with emerging DevOps methodologies, advancements in serverless security, and potential enhancements in serverless platform capabilities.

In conclusion, serverless computing presents a promising paradigm for optimizing DevOps workflows by providing scalable, cost-effective, and efficient solutions for application deployment and management. However, careful consideration of performance metrics and cost implications is essential to fully leverage the benefits of serverless architectures. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of serverless computing's role in DevOps, offering valuable insights for practitioners and researchers aiming to harness the full potential of this evolving technology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Shoufan, A. AlSahafi, and M. M. Al-Ghamdi, “Serverless computing: A systematic review and research agenda,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 112, pp. 663-680, Dec. 2020.

D. Williams and C. Le, “A performance comparison of serverless computing platforms: AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 158250-158263, Aug. 2020.

A. Alozie, H. Zhao, and Y. Xiang, “Serverless computing in practice: Insights from deployment pipelines,” Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), pp. 23-30, Jul. 2020.

M. Feldman and L. Liu, “Serverless architectures: Challenges and future research directions,” IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 15-23, May/Jun. 2020.

N. Agarwal, P. Singh, and D. Kapoor, “Cost efficiency in serverless computing: Analysis and best practices,” IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 105-118, Jan./Mar. 2020.

K. Johnson and M. Sullivan, “Event-driven serverless computing for scalable applications,” Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 1-8, Aug. 2020.

J. Miller, E. Kim, and S. Sharma, “Automated testing in serverless architectures: A case study,” Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification & Validation (ICST), pp. 305-313, Apr. 2020.

A. Patel and L. Smith, “Serverless computing in DevOps: Benefits and trade-offs,” Journal of Cloud Computing: Advances, Systems and Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-14, Jan. 2020.

Y. Kim, “Serverless computing: A survey and future directions,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 912-925, Jun. 2020.

Z. Hu and J. Li, “Comparative analysis of serverless platforms in cloud environments,” IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 735-748, Jul./Sep. 2021.

B. Miller, “Integrating serverless computing with continuous integration and continuous deployment pipelines,” Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), pp. 45-52, Jul. 2021.

S. Kumar and R. Bansal, “Performance evaluation of serverless computing platforms: A comprehensive study,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 912-926, Sep. 2021.

T. Roberts, “The impact of serverless computing on DevOps workflows,” IEEE Software, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 68-76, Jan./Feb. 2020.

H. Zhang, “Serverless computing: Opportunities and challenges in modern application development,” IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 58-66, Nov./Dec. 2020.

M. Jones and D. Brown, “Cost models for serverless computing: An empirical study,” IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 79-89, Jan./Mar. 2021.

E. Smith and L. Thompson, “Scalability considerations in serverless architectures,” Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 19-27, Aug. 2021.

C. Young and R. Lee, “Serverless computing and DevOps: Synergies and challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 459-472, Apr./Jun. 2021.

A. Turner and N. Shah, “Security concerns in serverless computing: An overview,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 62-70, Jul./Aug. 2020.

W. Harris, “Future trends in serverless computing: A forward-looking perspective,” IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 12-19, Jan./Feb. 2021.

P. Zhao and X. Wang, “Serverless computing for event-driven applications: An in-depth review,” IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 423-434, Jul./Sep. 2020.

Downloads

Published

05-10-2018

How to Cite

[1]
V. Rama Raju Alluri, V. Sri Manoj Bonam, V. Kumar Reddy Vangoor, and C. Sasidhar Ravi, “Serverless Computing for DevOps: Practical Use Cases and Performance Analysis”, Distrib Learn Broad Appl Sci Res, vol. 4, pp. 158–180, Oct. 2018, Accessed: Dec. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dlabi.org/index.php/journal/article/view/95

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

71-80 of 109

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.