Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Systems: Practical Implementations in Robotics

Authors

  • Ashok Kumar Pamidi Vankata Software Engineer, XtracIT, North Carolina, USA Author
  • Venkata Sri Manoj Bonam Data Engineer, Lincoln Financial Group, Omaha, USA Author
  • Vinay Kumar Reddy Vangoor System Administrator, Techno Bytes Inc, Arizona, USA Author
  • Sai Manoj Yellepeddi System Analyst, Wave Solutions Inc, Oregan, USA Author
  • Shashi Thota Data Engineer, Orrbasystems.com, California, USA Author

Keywords:

Reinforcement Learning, Robotics, Q-learning, Deep Q-Networks, Policy Gradient Methods

Abstract

Reinforcement Learning (RL) have emerged as a transformative paradigm in the realm of autonomous systems, particularly in robotics, where it significantly enhances the capabilities of robots in control, navigation, and manipulation tasks. This paper provides an in-depth exploration of RL applications within autonomous robotic systems, focusing on the theoretical underpinnings and practical implementations of various RL algorithms. The discussion encompasses foundational RL concepts, including Q-learning, Deep Q-Networks (DQN), and policy gradient methods, examining their efficacy and integration in robotic systems.

Q-learning, a model-free algorithm that iteratively updates value estimates to derive an optimal policy, has laid the groundwork for many RL applications in robotics. Despite its simplicity and effectiveness in discrete action spaces, Q-learning faces limitations in handling complex, continuous environments. To address these limitations, Deep Q-Networks (DQN) have been developed, leveraging deep neural networks to approximate the Q-value function. This advancement has significantly broadened the applicability of RL in high-dimensional state spaces, making it particularly valuable for complex robotic control tasks.

Policy gradient methods, another cornerstone of RL, optimize policies directly by estimating the gradient of expected rewards with respect to policy parameters. These methods are well-suited for problems with continuous action spaces and have been instrumental in developing advanced robotic manipulation strategies. By directly parameterizing the policy and optimizing it using gradient ascent, policy gradient methods enable robots to learn sophisticated behaviors that are challenging to capture with value-based approaches.

The paper provides a comprehensive review of practical implementations of these RL algorithms in various robotic applications. Case studies highlight successful deployments of RL in real-world robotic systems, showcasing their use in autonomous navigation, object manipulation, and complex coordination tasks. For instance, RL-based approaches have been utilized in autonomous vehicles to navigate dynamic environments, in robotic arms for precise manipulation of objects, and in multi-robot systems for collaborative tasks.

Despite the significant advancements, RL in robotics presents several challenges that need to be addressed. Sample efficiency is a primary concern, as RL algorithms often require vast amounts of data to converge to an optimal policy. Techniques such as experience replay and transfer learning are discussed as potential solutions to enhance sample efficiency. Safety and robustness are also critical issues, as robots must operate reliably in unpredictable and dynamic environments. The paper explores approaches for ensuring safe exploration and robust performance, including the integration of safety constraints into the learning process.

Scalability is another challenge, as RL algorithms must be adapted to handle increasingly complex tasks and environments. The paper examines current strategies for scaling RL methods, including hierarchical RL and multi-agent RL, which aim to decompose complex tasks into manageable subtasks and facilitate cooperation among multiple agents, respectively.

Future research directions in RL for autonomous systems are proposed, emphasizing the need for more efficient algorithms, improved safety mechanisms, and enhanced scalability. Innovations in neural network architectures, such as attention mechanisms and meta-learning, are expected to play a significant role in advancing RL applications in robotics. Additionally, the integration of RL with other machine learning paradigms, such as supervised learning and unsupervised learning, holds promise for developing more versatile and capable autonomous systems.

This paper offers a thorough examination of the application of RL in robotics, providing insights into both theoretical foundations and practical implementations. By addressing the current challenges and proposing future research directions, the paper aims to contribute to the ongoing development of RL-based autonomous systems, ultimately enhancing the capabilities and efficiency of robotic technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018.

C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. New York, NY: Springer, 2006.

M. Mnih et al., “Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning,” Nature, vol. 518, no. 7540, pp. 529–533, Feb. 2015.

V. Mnih et al., “Asynchronous actor-critic methods,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.01783, 2016.

J. Schulman et al., “Trust region policy optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.05477, 2015.

Y. Duan et al., “Benchmarking deep reinforcement learning for continuous control,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.06778, 2016.

D. Silver et al., “Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search,” Nature, vol. 529, no. 7587, pp. 484–489, Jan. 2016.

J. Peters and S. Schaal, “Reinforcement learning of motor skills with policy gradients,” Neural Networks, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 682–697, May 2008.

C. Hsu et al., “Deep Q-learning for robot navigation,” Journal of Robotics and Automation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 10–22, Jan. 2020.

M. Zhan et al., “A survey on reinforcement learning algorithms and their applications in robotics,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 190829–190846, 2020.

S. Levine et al., “End-to-end training of deep visuomotor policies,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–40, 2016.

A. J. Barto, “Temporal difference learning and TD-Gammon,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 35–38, Mar. 1995.

X. Chen et al., “Multi-agent reinforcement learning: A review,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 2399–2414, May 2021.

Z. Zhang and L. Liu, “Learning to coordinate in multi-agent systems using reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1125–1138, Mar. 2022.

R M. Li and D. Yang, “Safe and efficient exploration in reinforcement learning with probabilistic safety guarantees,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 563–577, Apr. 2022.

W. Xu, “Robust reinforcement learning with safety constraints: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 72480–72497, 2022.

D. Lee et al., “Hierarchical reinforcement learning for scalable robotics control,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1572–1585, Oct. 2018.

M. Da Silva et al., “Leveraging generative models for reinforcement learning in robotics,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3456–3463, Apr. 2021.

J.. and D. J. Chen and W. Hong, “Integrating reinforcement learning with unsupervised learning techniques for robotics,” IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 945–958, Mar. 2023.

H. Li, “Deep reinforcement learning for robotic grasping: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 212832–212845, 2021.

Downloads

Published

25-08-2018

How to Cite

[1]
A. K. P. Venkata, V. Sri Manoj Bonam, V. Kumar Reddy Vangoor, S. Manoj Yellepeddi, and S. Thota, “Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Systems: Practical Implementations in Robotics”, Distrib Learn Broad Appl Sci Res, vol. 4, pp. 146–157, Aug. 2018, Accessed: Nov. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dlabi.org/index.php/journal/article/view/94

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

51-60 of 120

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.