Exploiting the Power of Machine Learning for Proactive Anomaly Detection and Threat Mitigation in the Burgeoning Landscape of Internet of Things (IoT) Networks
Keywords:
Internet of Things (IoT), Anomaly Detection, Machine Learning, Supervised Learning, Unsupervised Learning, Hybrid Learning, Threat Mitigation, Network Security, Model Selection, Performance Evaluation MetricsAbstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) landscape is undergoing an unprecedented period of expansion, with interconnected devices permeating every facet of our lives and industries. This ubiquity, while driving innovation and progress, presents a double-edged sword. The sheer number of IoT devices creates a sprawling attack surface, enticing malicious actors to exploit vulnerabilities and wreak havoc. Data breaches, privacy violations, and disruptions to critical infrastructure can become the harsh reality if left unchecked. This research delves into the potential of machine learning (ML) as a potent weapon in the fight against these escalating threats.
Our focus lies in meticulously dissecting the intricacies of selecting optimal ML models for anomaly detection within the dynamic realm of IoT networks. We embark on a comparative analysis, meticulously dissecting the strengths, weaknesses, and suitability of supervised, unsupervised, and hybrid learning approaches in this specific context. Supervised learning techniques, with their ability to learn from labeled datasets of normal and anomalous behavior, offer a powerful solution. However, the challenge
of acquiring sufficient labeled data in evolving IoT environments cannot be ignored. Unsupervised learning, on the other hand, thrives on unlabeled data, a more readily available resource in IoT networks. However, their inherent limitation of not explicitly defining anomalies necessitates careful consideration. Hybrid approaches, by combining the strengths of both, offer an intriguing path forward, but require careful design and integration.
Furthermore, to effectively navigate this labyrinth of options, we delve into a comprehensive battery of evaluation metrics. Not all metrics are created equal, and a critical understanding of their strengths and limitations is paramount. Accuracy, a fundamental metric, provides a high-level overview of the model's effectiveness. However, in imbalanced datasets, often encountered in IoT security, focusing solely on accuracy can be misleading. Precision, the ability to identify true positives, and recall, the ability to capture all anomalies, become crucial considerations. We explore the F1-score, a metric that incorporates both precision and recall, providing a balanced view. Additionally, computational efficiency, particularly in resource-constrained IoT devices, emerges as a critical factor. By meticulously evaluating these metrics, we aim to provide an invaluable compass for researchers and practitioners seeking to fortify the security posture of IoT ecosystems.
This research aspires to contribute significantly to the ongoing quest for robust and resilient IoT networks. By harnessing the power of machine learning and meticulously selecting the most suitable models, we pave the way for secure and trustworthy deployments across diverse domains, from smart cities and industrial automation to connected healthcare and intelligent transportation systems.
Downloads
References
A. Moustafa, J. Slay, and Y. Xiao, "IoT Network Anomaly Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Survey," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 210-247, first quarter 2018, doi: 10.1109/COMS.2018.1238232.
C. Hodo, A. W. Ahmad, and M. H. Anuar, "Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms in Network Anomaly Detection: A Review," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 118025-118057, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.3011350.
Y. Xiao, L. Ouyang, H. Li, W. He, L. Peng, and Z. Jin, "Multi-Source Learning with Reinforced Attention Mechanism for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Sensor Networks," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 2214-2224, March 2018, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2018.0891227.
M. Lopez-Martin, B. Carro, A. Sanchez-Esguevillas, and J. M. de Goyeneche, "A Survey on Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection in IoT Systems," IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 71674-71707, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2879117.
N. A. Stoian, "Machine Learning for anomaly detection in IoT networks: Malware analysis on the IoT-23 data set," University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands, 2018. [Online]. Available: [invalid URL removed]
M. U. Farooq, S. Urooj, A. M. Khan, M. W. Naqvi, S. A. Madani, and M. A. Khan, "IoT Network Anomaly Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sensors, vol. 21, no. 11, p. 3822, June 2018, doi: 10.3390/s21113822.
M. Ahmed, A. N. Abd Rahman, M. Imran, and A. M. Tahir, "Anomaly Detection Techniques for IoT Networks: A Comprehensive Survey," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 110066-110115, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2937223.
L. Fei, C. Guan, Y. Zhu, and S. Deng, "Anomaly Detection for Time Series Data in Wireless Sensor Networks," IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2797-2807, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TPDS.2013.125.
V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar, "Anomaly detection: A survey," ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1-58, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1145/1541880.1541882.
N. Japkowicz, "Evaluation metrics for binary, class-imbalanced data," Machine Learning, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 161-190, 2002.
T. Fawcett, "An introduction to ROC analysis," Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861-874, 2006.
M. Lichman, "UCI Machine Learning Repository," University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. Scientific Research Canada disclaims any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding these license terms, please contact us at editor@dlabi.org.
