The Impact of the Millennial Consumer Base on Online Payments
Keywords:
Millennials, mobile walletsAbstract
The millennial generation, born between 1981 and 1996, has become a driving force in shaping industries worldwide, with their unique preferences and behaviors particularly influencing the online payments ecosystem. Growing up during the digital revolution, millennials are inherently tech-savvy and demand seamless, convenient, and secure digital experiences. This shift in consumer expectations has compelled businesses and financial institutions to innovate rapidly, adapting to the preferences of a generation that values speed, transparency, and personalization. Millennials' preference for mobile-first solutions has fueled the widespread adoption of mobile payment platforms. Apple Pay, Google Wallet, and Samsung Pay gained traction by offering simple, fast, and secure payment methods that integrate easily into their digital lifestyles. At the same time, the rise of peer-to-peer (P2P) payment platforms, such as Venmo and PayPal, reflects millennials' desire for instant, low-cost, and socially integrated payment options. These platforms make it easy to split bills or send money and tap into the social dynamics of sharing & community, which resonate strongly with millennial values. Trust and security also play a critical role in adopting online payment solutions. Millennials are cautious about sharing personal and financial information online, pushing businesses to prioritize robust security measures, such as tokenization, encryption, and two-factor authentication. At the same time, user experience is non-negotiable for this generation. To retain millennial customers, payment providers must deliver intuitive interfaces, frictionless transactions, and responsive customer support. The generation's preference for personalization has driven demand for payment systems that integrate with loyalty programs, offer tailored recommendations, and support diverse payment options. Businesses that fail to meet these expectations risk losing relevance in a market where millennials increasingly dominate.
Downloads
References
Mangold, W. G., & Smith, K. T. (2012). Selling to Millennials with online reviews. Business Horizons, 55(2), 141-153.
Tan, E., & Leby Lau, J. (2016). Behavioural intention to adopt mobile banking among the millennial generation. Young Consumers, 17(1), 18-31.
Taken Smith, K. (2012). Longitudinal study of digital marketing strategies targeting Millennials. Journal of consumer marketing, 29(2), 86-92.
Zhang, D., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). Powering e-learning in the new millennium: an overview of e-learning and enabling technology. Information systems frontiers, 5, 207-218.
Pomarici, E., & Vecchio, R. (2014). Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: An exploratory study on Italian consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 537-545.
Smith, K. T. (2011). Digital marketing strategies that Millennials find appealing, motivating, or just annoying. Journal of Strategic marketing, 19(6), 489-499.
Bilgihan, A. (2016). Gen Y customer loyalty in online shopping: An integrated model of trust, user experience and branding. Computers in human behavior, 61, 103-113.
Gladden, J. M., Irwin, R. L., & Sutton, W. A. (2001). Managing North American major professional sport teams in the new millennium: A focus on building brand equity. Journal of sport management, 15(4), 297-317.
Eastman, J. K., Iyer, R., & Thomas, S. P. (2013). The impact of status consumption on shopping styles: An exploratory look at the millennial generation. Marketing Management Journal, 23(1), 57-73.
Koschate-Fischer, N., Stefan, I. V., & Hoyer, W. D. (2012). Willingness to pay for cause-related marketing: The impact of donation amount and moderating effects. Journal of marketing research, 49(6), 910-927.
Bowen, J. T., & Chen McCain, S. L. (2015). Transitioning loyalty programs: A commentary on “the relationship between customer loyalty and customer satisfaction”. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(3), 415-430.
Furnell, S. M., & Karweni, T. (1999). Security implications of electronic commerce: a survey of consumers and businesses. Internet research, 9(5), 372-382.
Hassan, S., Nadzim, S. Z. A., & Shiratuddin, N. (2015). Strategic use of social media for small business based on the AIDA model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 262-269.
Eastman, J. K., Iyer, R., Liao-Troth, S., Williams, D. F., & Griffin, M. (2014). The role of involvement on millennials' mobile technology behaviors: The moderating impact of status consumption, innovation, and opinion leadership. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22(4), 455-470.
Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers gen-xers millennials. EDUCAUSE review, 500(4), 37-47.
Naresh Dulam. Apache Spark: The Future Beyond MapReduce. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Dec. 2015, pp. 136-5
Naresh Dulam. NoSQL Vs SQL: Which Database Type Is Right for Big Data?. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, May 2015, pp. 115-3
Naresh Dulam. Data Lakes: Building Flexible Architectures for Big Data Storage. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Oct. 2015, pp. 95-114
Naresh Dulam. The Rise of Kubernetes: Managing Containers in Distributed Systems. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, July 2015, pp. 73-94
Naresh Dulam. Snowflake: A New Era of Cloud Data Warehousing. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Apr. 2015, pp. 49-72
Naresh Dulam. The Shift to Cloud-Native Data Analytics: AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Discussing the Growing Trend of Cloud-Native Big Data Processing Solutions. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Feb. 2015, pp. 28-48
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. Scientific Research Canada disclaims any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding these license terms, please contact us at editor@dlabi.org.
