Comparative Analysis of Self-Hosted Kubernetes vs. Amazon EKS for Startups
Keywords:
Kubernetes, Amazon EKSAbstract
Kubernetes has emerged as a powerful and widely adopted tool for container orchestration, offering organizations an efficient way to automate containerized applications' deployment, scaling, and management. However, deciding between self-hosted Kubernetes and managed services like Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) presents a significant challenge for startups. Each option comes with its own trade-offs, particularly in cost, complexity, & scalability, which are critical considerations for startups with limited resources & fast growth trajectories. Self-hosting Kubernetes gives startups complete control over their infrastructure and environment. Still, it often comes with increased operational complexity, as teams must handle everything from cluster management to security and monitoring. Additionally, managing Kubernetes in-house typically requires a skilled engineering team and can lead to higher initial setup costs and ongoing maintenance expenses. On the other hand, Amazon EKS offers a managed solution that simplifies much of the Kubernetes deployment process, reducing the burden on teams and allowing them to focus more on application development rather than infrastructure. However, EKS introduces its cost structure, which, depending on the scale of the operation, may become more expensive as the business grows. In terms of scalability, both solutions can support startups as they expand. Still, the flexibility of a self-hosted Kubernetes setup can allow for more granular control over resources and scaling policies. For startups, choosing between these two options involves weighing the benefits of flexibility & power against the convenience and scalability of managed services. This paper examines these factors, providing startups with a clearer understanding of which solution may best suit their needs and long-term goals.
Downloads
References
Sayfan, G. (2018). Mastering Kubernetes: Master the art of container management by using the power of Kubernetes. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Bischoff, M. (2018). Design and implementation of a framework for validating kubernetes policies through automatic test generation (Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. dissertation, Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart).
Tran, K. (2011). Building virtual lab with amazon cloud services (Doctoral dissertation, Minnesota State University, Mankato).
Menga, J. (2018). Docker on Amazon Web Services: Build, deploy, and manage your container applications at scale. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Jørgensen, N. K. (2017). Startup Culture.
McElhiney, P. R. (2018). Scalable Web Service Development with Amazon Web Services. University of New Hampshire.
Zaytsev, A. (2018). Continuous integration for kubernetes based platform solution.
Luksa, M. (2017). Kubernetes in action. Simon and Schuster.
Medel, V., Rana, O., Bañares, J. Á., & Arronategui, U. (2016, December). Modelling performance & resource management in kubernetes. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (pp. 257-262).
Medel, V., Tolosana-Calasanz, R., Bañares, J. Á., Arronategui, U., & Rana, O. F. (2018). Characterising resource management performance in Kubernetes. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 68, 286-297.
Rensin, D. K. (2015). Kubernetes: Scheduling the Future at Cloud Scale.
Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., & Navathe, S. B. (1986). A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 18(4), 323-364.
Wolde-Rufael, Y., & Idowu, S. (2017). Income distribution and CO2 emission: A comparative analysis for China and India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 1336-1345.
Smith, B., & Linden, G. (2017). Two decades of recommender systems at Amazon. com. Ieee internet computing, 21(3), 12-18.
Chevalier, J., & Goolsbee, A. (2003). Measuring prices and price competition online: Amazon. com and BarnesandNoble. com. Quantitative marketing and Economics, 1, 203-222.
Komandla, V. Transforming Financial Interactions: Best Practices for Mobile Banking App Design and Functionality to Boost User Engagement and Satisfaction.
Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL/ELT, Data Integration Challenges, Integration Patterns. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
Gade, K. R. (2017). Migrations: Challenges and Best Practices for Migrating Legacy Systems to Cloud-Based Platforms. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
Naresh Dulam. Data Lakes: Building Flexible Architectures for Big Data Storage. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Oct. 2015, pp. 95-114
Naresh Dulam. Data Lakes Vs Data Warehouses: What’s Right for Your Business?. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 2, Nov. 2016, pp. 71-94
Naresh Dulam, and Venkataramana Gosukonda. Event-Driven Architectures With Apache Kafka and Kubernetes. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 3, Oct. 2017, pp. 115-36
Naresh Dulam, et al. Data Governance and Compliance in the Age of Big Data. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 4, Nov. 2018
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License Terms
Ownership and Licensing:
Authors of research papers submitted to Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal certain rights. Authors maintain ownership of the copyright and have granted the journal a right of first publication. Simultaneously, authors agree to license their research papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License.
License Permissions:
Under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License, others are permitted to share and adapt the work, as long as proper attribution is given to the authors and acknowledgement is made of the initial publication in the journal. This license allows for the broad dissemination and utilization of research papers.
Additional Distribution Arrangements:
Authors are free to enter into separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work. This may include posting the work to institutional repositories, publishing it in journals or books, or other forms of dissemination. In such cases, authors are requested to acknowledge the initial publication of the work in this journal.
Online Posting:
Authors are encouraged to share their work online, including in institutional repositories, disciplinary repositories, or on their personal websites. This permission applies both prior to and during the submission process to the journal. Online sharing enhances the visibility and accessibility of the research papers.
Responsibility and Liability:
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research papers do not infringe upon the copyright, privacy, or other rights of any third party. Scientific Research Canada disclaims any liability or responsibility for any copyright infringement or violation of third-party rights in the research papers.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding these license terms, please contact us at editor@dlabi.org.
